Legal Opinion
Craig v. Carlson
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided June 25, 2007No. 06SC99PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bender
Introduction
Two judges were assigned to Petitioners Carla and Dennis Craig’s medical malpractice case against Respondent Dr. Hillis Carlson. One judge conducted the trial (“trial court”) and the other conducted the pre-trial and post-trial motions (“successor court”). During the course of jury selection, the Craigs objected that Carlson was exercising his peremptory challenges discriminatorily to remove women from the jury in violation of Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79, 106 S.Ct. 1712, 90 L.Ed.2d 69 (1986). Carlson responded that Batson does not apply to cases of gender discrimination and…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Miller-El v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Hernandez v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- J. E. B. v. Alabama ex rel. T. B.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Edmonson v. Leesville Concrete Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- People v. RobinsonColorado Court of Appeals · 2008
- People v. RodriguezSupreme Court of Colorado · 2015
- People v. CollinsColorado Court of Appeals · 2008
- People v. MoralesColorado Court of Appeals · 2014
- Theodore Israel Madrid Judgment Affirmed en banc JUSTICE HOOD delivered the Opinion of the Court, in which JUSTICE MÁRQUEZ JUSTICE GABRIEL JUSTICE HARTSupreme Court of Colorado · 2023
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.