Legal Opinion

Ansel v. Olson

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 15, 1888PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error from McPherson District Court. Action by Ansel against Olson and another, to recover $49.87, alleged to be due on a certain promissory note. Trial by a jury; verdict for defendants; new trial denied, and judgment rendered against the plaintiff for costs, on May 10,1886. The plaintiff brings the case to this court. The opinion states the facts.

1Opinion of the Court

*768The opinion of the court was delivered by

Valentine, J.:

This was an action brought before a justice of the peace of McPherson county by S. J. Ansel against Neis T. Olson and John Nelson, to recover $49.87, as an alleged balance due on a certain promissory note, which reads as follows:

“$429.50. Marquette, Kas., November 28,1883.
“Ten months after date, we promise to pay to the order of S. J. Ansel four hundred and twenty-nine dollars and fifty-hundredths ($429.50) at McPherson, Kansas, if not paid when due, for value received, with interest at the rate of twelve per cent, per annum from date,…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sheldon v. PruessnerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1894
  2. Holmes v. DeweySupreme Court of Kansas · 1903
  3. Robbins v. MaddySupreme Court of Kansas · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API