Legal Opinion

Smith v. Rowles

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1882No. 9915PublishedCited by 5 opinions

From the Hamilton Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHowk, J.

This was a suit by the appellant against the appellees to obtain a decree and judgment of the court, declaring a sheriff’s sale and deed of certain real estate in Hamilton county to the appellee Mary Rowles, to be illegal, irregular and void, and to have no foundation, force or effect. The' appellees’ demurrer to appellant’s complaint, for the alleged insufficiency of the facts therein to constitute a cause of action, was sustained by the court, and to this ruling appellant excepted. He declined to amend or plead further, and judgment was rendered that he take nothing by his suit, and that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Meredith v. ChanceyIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  2. Loughridge v. City of HuntingtonIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  3. Rhoades v. DelaneyIndiana Supreme Court · 1875

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Finlayson v. PetersonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Security Co. v. ArbuckleIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Hill v. PressleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Peck v. Wm. M. Birch Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1923
  5. State Ex Rel. Hare v. Lawrence's EstateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API