Legal Opinion

Virgil State Bank v. Wahl

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1929No. File No. 6075PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBro'W'N, J.

Defendant Fredrich Wahl, a farmer, and his wife, Mary, occupied as their home a section of land in Beadle county, title to which was in 'Fredrich, subject to a mortgage on which about $19,000 was due, when foreclosure proceedings were commenced. They then deeded the land to the mortgagee, who gave Fredrich an option to buy it back within two years on payment of the amount against it. Seeing no prospect of being able to avail himself of the option, Fredrich traded it for a half section of land in Hutchinson county which was also heavily mortgaged, and in less than a month found that he could…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Morse v. RoachMichigan Supreme Court · 1924

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Pierce v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1974
  2. Lind v. O. N. Johnson Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
  3. Angers v. SabatinelliWisconsin Supreme Court · 1940
  4. CAHILL-MOONEY CONSTRUCTION COMPANY v. AyresMontana Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Hove v. FrazierSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1962

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API