Legal Opinion

Wright v. Richcreek

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided September 16, 1935No. 4450PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Justice.

The parties' will carry here the same des-, ignation as in the trial court.

Plaintiff sued defendants for the title and possession of a section of land in Castro county, Tex. Defendants answered by plea of not guilty, claiming that an absolute deed held by plaintiff to this land was in fact a mortgage.

The essential facts are: Defendants in 1929 received a deed to this land, which recited they took it subject to an indebtedness of $7,200 in favor of the Dallas Joint Stock Land Bank, and also subject to an indebtedness of $11,194 due plaintiff. Thereafter, a new contract was made…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hill v. StampfliCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  2. Smith v. KoenneckeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Parmenter v. KellisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941
  2. Jaramillo v. McLoyDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1967
  3. Prince Bros. Drilling Co. v. Fuhrman Petroleum Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1941
  4. Elder v. WehmeyerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API