Legal Opinion
In re Banks
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided February 9, 2016No. Bankruptcy No. 15-bk-09819PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION ON TRUSTEE’S MOTION TO DISMISS AND DEBTOR’S MOTION TO CONFIRM PROPOSED CHAPTER 13 PLAN
Jack B. Schmetterer, United States Bankruptcy Judge
The Chapter 13 Trustee has moved to dismiss Debtor’s Chapter 13 plan (the “Motion to Dismiss”) (Dkt.# 31) and the Debtor has moved to confirm (the “Motion to Confirm”) (Dkt.# 32) his. Chapter 13 plan (the “Plan”) (Dkt.# 2). As always, the Trustee is diligent in seeking to bring to the Court’s attention any potential abuse of the bankruptcy system. He argues that (1) the Plan was proposed in bad faith because (a) it is a plan to pay only…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Grogan v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Marrama v. Citizens Bank of Mass.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Baker Botts L.L.P. v. ASARCO LLCSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
- In Re Julian Roosevelt Goeb and Jane Alma Goeb, Debtors. In Re Julian Roosevelt Goeb and Jane Alma Goeb v. Harry W. Heid, Chapter 13 TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- In the Matter of Kenneth W. Smith, Debtor. Appeal of State of IndianaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In re HowardUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2018
- In re DunsonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas · 2016
- In re DuganUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas · 2016
- In re: Ervin E. RoseUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan · 2016