Security National Bank of Sioux City v. St. Croix Power Co.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of tbe circuit court for St. Croix county: E. W. Helms, Circuit Judge. Tbe plaintiff, a national bank, organized under tbe banking laws of tbe United States, at Sioux City, Iowa, commenced tbis action to enforce payment of a claim wbicb it alleges is due it under tbe transactions stated in tbe complaint.
Read the full summary
Appeal from a judgment of tbe circuit court for St. Croix county: E. W. Helms, Circuit Judge. Tbe plaintiff, a national bank, organized under tbe banking laws of tbe United States, at Sioux City, Iowa, commenced tbis action to enforce payment of a claim wbicb it alleges is due it under tbe transactions stated in tbe complaint. Tbe material facts alleged in tbe complaint are fully stated in tbe report of tbe case on its former appeal to tbis court in 117 Wis. 211, 94 N. W. 74. In addition to tbe facts there stated, tbe material facts of tbe transaction involved on tbis appeal as shown by tbe…
1Opinion of the Court
SibbeoKER, T.
Upon the former appeal of this case it was determined that if plaintiff succeeded to the rights of the subcontractor with the consent of the principal contractor, the administratrix of Eobson’s estate, and the defendant as owner, then plaintiff stood as subcontractor in place of the deceased Eobson, and this “put the bank in the shoes of Eobson and constituted it, in truth and in fact, a subcontractor.” 117 Wis. 211, 94 N. W. 74. The plaintiff now claims the right to a subcontractor’s lien against defendant’s property as the party substituted for Eobson after his decease.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Tweeddale v. TweeddaleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1903
- Hathaway v. . PayneNew York Court of Appeals · 1865
- Pabst Brewing Co. v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1905
- Security National Bank v. St. Croix Power Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1903
- Newell v. New Holstein Canning Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1903
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Carson Payson Co. v. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1914