Elmondorff v. Carmichael
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
a^eajjnm a jw]gmeni 0f ^ Gemral CemL
1Opinion of the Court
equate iii terms to vest the estate; and all the rest of the points d$fided by the,pourt below, rest upon the question, whether, as the grants of the defendants had all issued previous to the death of Robertas S. Brandtz, and the consequent escheat thereupon to the government, the title when escheated inured to the benefit of these junior grantees, so that government could not grant it again unless subject to these posterior grants as contended for by the defendants; or whether the govern-meat took the estate as an entire thing, unaffected by junior patents, and could grant it again, paying…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Fletcher v. PeckSupreme Court of the United States · 1810
- Sayward v. CarlsonWashington Supreme Court · 1890
- Massie v. SebastianCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1816
3Cited by13 opinions
- White v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1859
- Branson v. WirthSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
- Trustees of Internal Improvement Fund v. LobeanSupreme Court of Florida · 1961
- Commonwealth v. Rosenfield Bros.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1904
- Mitchell v. LasseterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.