Legal Opinion

Wynantskill Knitting Co. v. Murray

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 3, 1895PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from circuit court, Rensselaer county. Action by the Wynantskill Knitting Company against Edward P. Murray and another. From a judgment for defendants, entered on a verdict, and from an order denying plaintiff’s motion for a new trial, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtPutnam, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment entered in the Rensselaer county clerk’s office on November 20, 1894, upon a verdict of a jury, and from an order denying the plaintiff’s motion for a new trial. The following facts may be deemed established by the verdict of the jury: On Wednesday, the 6th day of July, 1892, a barge belonging to defendants left the city of New York with 100 *27bales of cotton, owned by the plaintiff, which were shipped to it at the city of-Troy. The barge arrived at Troy, reaching the dock at the foot of State street, where the defendants conduct their business, on the morning…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wright v. . Bank of the MetropolisNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
  2. Colt v. . OwensNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
  3. Tarbell v. . Royal Exchange Shipping Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1888
  4. Redmond v. Liverpool, New York & Philadelphia Steamboat Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1871
  5. Scheu v. . BenedictNew York Court of Appeals · 1889

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hutchinson v. United States Express Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1907
  2. King v. New Brunswick, Amboy & New York Steamboat Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1901
  3. American Railway Express Co. v. RhodyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API