Legal Opinion

Gatlin v. . Kilpatrick

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 5, 1814PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The bill stated, in substance, that in February, 1806, the complainant purchased from the defendant a stud horse for £ 150, payable the ensuing Christmas; but that it was agreed between them, if the horse died before the end of the season, no part of the price was to be paid, (148) which was attested by witnesses, and a note drawn expressing the same; that the defendant refused to receive this note, as the condition rendered it unnegotiable, but repeated his determination to abide by the conditions, nevertheless; on which the complainant gave an unconditional note. That the horse died a month…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Commissioners of Greene County v. Holliday's ExecutorsSuperior Court of North Carolina · 1806

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. McCoy v. . JusticeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  2. Peace v. . NailingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1829
  3. Scrivner v. McClellandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  4. Taylor v. . WoodSuperior Court of North Carolina · 1804

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API