Legal Opinion
State v. Cozad
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided September 29, 1976No. 3486PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOLOHAN, Justice.
The defendant, Daniel Arthur Cozad, was tried and convicted of armed robbery and sentenced to confinement for six to eight years. This appeal followed.
The issues raised on appeal are:
1. Should the defendant have been allowed a change of judge?
2. Should the motion to suppress evidence have been granted ?
3. Should the in-court identification have been suppressed?
4. Should a mistrial have been declared because of comments by the prosecutor ?
The facts in the case are that the defendant and an accomplice, Dorothy Kline, robbed a convenience market. Although the defendant and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- State v. DessureaultArizona Supreme Court · 1969
- United States of America Ex Rel. Cleveland Hines v. J. E. Lavallee, Superintendent, Clinton Correctional Facility, Dannemora, NewyorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- Pulliam v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1976
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. HerrinLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1990
- State v. LaddSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- State v. GarciaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1983
- State v. FilipovCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
- State v. NelsonArizona Supreme Court · 1981
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.