Legal Opinion

Carter ex rel. Carter v. Bailey

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 6, 1942Published

1Per curiam

If it should be conceded that there is evidence of negligence, and of authority of the employee of defendant, Hayes v. Creamery Co., 195 N. C., 113, 141 S. E., 340, plaintiff, by his own testimony, brings himself within the general applicable rule that passengers who are injured while attempting to get on or off a moving train cannot recover for injury. Browne v. R. R., 108 N. C., 34, 12 S. E., 958; Carter v. R. R., 165 N. C., 244, 81 S. E., 321; Stamey v. R. R., 208 N. C., 668, 182 S. E., 130; Wingate v. R. R., 220 N. C., 251, 17 S. E. (2d), 6.

Affirmed.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Browne v. Raleigh & Gaston RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
  2. Hayes v. Pine State CreamerySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  3. Stamey v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
  4. Browne v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
  5. Carter v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1914

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API