Legal Opinion

In Re City of Chicago

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided August 29, 2007No. 07-2608PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EASTERBROOK, Chief Judge.

Prince Foryoh has filed many frivolous civil suits. Most have been pursued in forma pauperis, a status granted on the basis of representations that both a^ district judge and this court have concluded were designed to mislead. After losing these suits, Foryoh failed to pay the costs awarded against him.

Judicial patience has limits, and earlier this year this court directed Foryoh to pay what he owes, if he wishes to continue litigating. We reproduce here the order in Foryoh v. Banas, 231 Fed.Appx. 484 (7th Cir.2007). Although that order was non-precedential under…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Support Systems International, Inc. v. Richard MackCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
  2. Gary B. Campbell v. David A. Clarke, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
  3. Foryoh, Prince E. v. Banas, RonaldCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Carr v. TilleryCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
  2. Anthony Martin v. Timothy ReddenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2022
  3. Richards v. HSBC Technology & Services USA, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
  4. Yvonne Averhart v. Cook County SheriffCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
  5. DeNardo v. MaassenAlaska Supreme Court · 2009

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API