Swanson v. Ball
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWarren, J.
An action was commencéd by the service of a summons and complaint by Augusta C. Swanson upon the above named defendants. Amiel W. Ball and Fred J. Ball demurred to plaintiff’s complaint on the ground that At does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The Western Surety Company, a corporation, defendant, demurred separately. It appealed from an order overruling the demurrer of the lower court and is here on appeal. See Swanson v. Ball, 67 S. D. 196, 291 N. W. 577.
The complaint alleges that the defendants Amiel W. Ball and Fred J. Ball were licensed and bonded liquor…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Moberg v. ScottSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1917
- Holmstrom v. WallSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1936
- Moberg v. ScottSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1919
- Kennedy v. GarriganSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1909
- Paulson v. LangnessSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1903
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Vesely v. SagerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Hoekstra v. HelgelandSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1959
- Carr v. TurnerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1965
- Green v. Siegel, Barnett & SchutzSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
- Knowles v. United StatesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.