Legal Opinion

Postley v. Cheyne

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided July 15, 1886Published

Contest among co-executors; the facts respecting which are sufficiently stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

The Surrogate.

This testator left at his decease *493real and personal property of the value of about fifteen hundred thousand dollars. By his last will and testament, which was. admitted to probate in February, 1885, he appointed his daughter, Margaret S. Postley, executrix, and Hugh Cheyne and John Scott (whom he characterized as his “friends ”) executors, declaring that he had entire confidence in their integrity, and therefore directed that they should not be required to give bonds for the faithful performance of their duties.

Upon the day the will was admitted to probate, letters testamentary…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bundy v. . BundyNew York Court of Appeals · 1868
  2. Bundy v. BundyNew York Supreme Court · 1866
  3. Martin v. DukeNew York Surrogate's Court · 1882

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API