Burlington & Summit Apartments, Midland Mortgage Co. v. Manolato
Supreme Court of Iowa
1DissentMiller, J.
(dissenting) — I am unablé to concur in the majority opinion herein and respectfully dissent from the conclusion reached in division III thereof.
The question there decided is stated thus: “Is the provision of section 6432 that no rent is recoverable where a certificate of conformity has not been issued an unreasonable, arbitrary, and oppressive exercise of the police power, in violation of due process?” The majority answer the question in the negative. As applied to the record herein, I would answer in the' affirmative.
One difficulty presented by the record herein is that the question comes…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Co. v. BeckwithSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Seaboard Air Line Railway v. SeegersSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. WynneSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Clark v. American Express Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1906
- Pierce v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1917
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.