Legal Opinion

Howland v. Harris

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts

Decided October 15, 1827PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Trespass de bonis asportatis [by Gardner G. Howland and others, against Samuel D. Harris]. The case came before the court, upon a statement of facts agreed by the parties.

1Opinion of the Court

STORY, Circuit Justice.

Upon the statement of facts, the. main question resolves itself into the consideration of the true construction of the second proviso of the 62d section of the collection act of 1799, c. 128 [1 Stat. c. 22], The goods in question were, attached by the defendant, the marshal of this district, as the property of George D’Wolf, who was the original owner and consignee, and before the arrival of the same in port, assigned the same bona fide for a valuable consideration, and as security for a prior advance of 85,000, to the plaintiffs. The assignment was made of the original…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Cairns & Lord v. SmithNew York Supreme Court · 1811

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. FawcettU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1897

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API