Legal Opinion

People v. Wadsworth

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 4, 1886PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Error to Delta. (Grant, J.) Information for embezzlement. Respondent convicted. The facts are stated in the opinion. ■

1Opinion of the CourtMorse, J.

The respondent was convicted of embezzlement upon a trial in Delta county, a change of venue having been taken to that county from Marquette, where the information was filed and the alleged offense committed.

*501The information consisted of two counts, — one attempting to charge the defendant with the embezzlement of the money of John Dillon, and the other charging him with such embezzlement as the de facto treasurer of the city of Ishpeming. The trial proceeded upon the theory of the first count.

"While no objection seems to have been raised in the court below to the information, we have been…

2Cited by12 opinions

  1. Board of Fire & Water Commissioners v. WilkinsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
  2. State v. CunninghamSupreme Court of Missouri · 1900
  3. Collins v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1894
  4. State v. BlueUtah Supreme Court · 1898
  5. State v. BrittSupreme Court of Missouri · 1919

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API