Legal Opinion · Dissent

Bickowski v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 1, 1988No. 87-2266Published

1DissentCowart, Judge

The nunc pro tunc Order of Modification. of Probation filed December 10, 1987, is so cryptic and unclear that its intended purpose and effect cannot be determined. It should be declared void. The original sentence of five years’ incarceration, while split with 20 months to be immediately served and the balance of 40 months suspended subject to the successful completion of probation, in my opinion, exceeds the maximum guideline recommended sentence of 30 months for the reasons set forth in the dissents in Carr v. State, 528 So.2d 406 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988); McKee v. State, 528 So.2d 417 (Fla. 5th…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. McKee v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
  2. Carr v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
  3. Hankey v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
  4. Williams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
  5. Lloyd v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API