Legal Opinion
Cornett v. Hough
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided December 13, 1893No. 16,128PublishedCited by 7 opinions
From the Marion. Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtHoward, C. J.
This was an action for partition and to quiet title to real estate.
The facts were found by the court, and are not in dis~‘ pute. Those material to the questions to be decided are as follows:
Samuel Canby died testate, leaving no child or father or mother surviving, but leaving his widow, Elizabeth Canby, as his sole heir at law. By his last will he devised to his widow in fee-simple absolute his entire estate.
Elizabeth Canby departed this life intestate on the 12th day of February, 1888, the owner in fee-simple of certain real estate in Marion county, Indiana; parts of which were the lands in…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Felton v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
- Fletcher v. HolmesIndiana Supreme Court · 1870
- Wilhite v. HamrickIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- Hasselman v. LoweIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
- Brown v. HarmonIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- In Re Long's EstateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- Aetna Life Insurance v. StrykerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1905
- Luken v. FickleIndiana Court of Appeals · 1908
- Roney v. DyerCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1939
- Gardner's Estate v. GardnerUtah Supreme Court · 1912
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.