Legal Opinion

Innis v. State

New York Court of Appeals

Decided September 20, 1983PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [g]), order affirmed, with costs.

The determination of an application to file a late claim pursuant to subdivision 6 of section 10 of the Court of Claims Act is within the discretion of the court below. (Bay Terrace Coop. Section IV v New York State Employees’ Retirement System, 55 NY2d 979, 981.) Absent an abuse of discretion, not present here, that determination is nonreviewable by this court. (Cohen and Karger, Powers of the New York Court of Appeals [rev…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bay Terrace Cooperative Section IV, Inc. v. New York State Employees' Retirement System Policemen's & Firemen's Retirement SystemNew York Court of Appeals · 1982

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. DeFilippis v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  2. Decker v. State of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018
  3. M.T.F. Industries, Inc. v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  4. Ruiz v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API