Legal Opinion
In Re Withrow
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided July 3, 2008No. 19-40281PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION
HENRY J. BOROFF, Bankruptcy Judge.
Before the Court is its Order, dated September 6, 2007, requiring Attorney Francis J. Lafayette (“Attorney Lafayette”), counsel to Daryl Withrow (the “Debtor”), to show cause why Attorney Lafayette should not, pursuant to Fed. R. Bankr.P. 9011(c)(1)(B) (“Rule 9011”), be sanctioned on account of alleged misrepresentations, omissions and errors in the Debtor’s bankruptcy schedules, Statement of Financial Affairs and Rebuttal of Presumption of Abuse (the “Show Cause Order”).
I. FACTS AND TRAVEL OF THE CASE
The relevant facts are either: (1)…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In Re D.C. Sullivan Co., Inc., Debtor. Daniel F. Featherston, Jr. v. Benjamin Goldman, Esquire and Goldman & GoldmanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
- In Re LaFranceUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 2004
- In Re RobertsonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 2007
- In Re LaClairUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 2006
3Cited by7 opinions
- Desiderio v. Parikh (In re Parikh)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 2014
- Dignity Health v. Seare (In re Seare)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Nevada · 2013
- Lafayette v. Collins (In Re Withrow)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the First Circuit · 2009
- In Re BuckUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 2010
- In Re DeanUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Idaho · 2008
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.