Legal Opinion

Kelly v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 28, 1937No. 4 Div. 974PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOSTER, Justice.

The opinion of the Court of Appeals shows that appellant was tried on a charge of robbery, which, of course, includes the lesser crimes of larceny and assault and battery. The trial court refused to give two charges for defendant, (1) that the indictment includes a charge of larceny, and (4) that it includes a charge of an assault and battery. Of course, the charges asserted correct legal propositions, and under section 8697, Code, the jury could have convicted defendant of either of those charges if, but only if, the evidence was sufficient to support such a charge. The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Whitehead v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  2. Gafford v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1899
  3. Robertson v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1931
  4. Reeves v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1921
  5. Brazier v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1932

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Chavers v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1978
  2. Fulghum v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1973
  3. Wallace v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1973
  4. De Graaf v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1948
  5. Ex Parte BeverlySupreme Court of Alabama · 1986

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API