Legal Opinion
Correll v. Ryan
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 14, 2008No. 03-99006PublishedCited by 95 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge THOMAS; Dissent by Judge O’SCANNLAIN.
ORDER
In response to the petition for rehearing, the panel has elected to file an amended opinion and amended dissent. The amended opinion and dissent are filed concomitantly herewith. With the filing of the amended opinion and dissent, Judges Schroeder and Thomas voted to deny the petition for rehearing and rehearing en banc. Judge O’Scannlain voted to grant the petition for rehearing and rehearing en banc.
The full court was advised of the petition for rehearing en banc. A judge requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. The…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Wiggins v. Smith, WardenSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Lindh v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1997
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by95 opinions
- Scott v. SchriroCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Robinson v. SchriroCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Cary Williams v. Timothy FilsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Earl Cannedy, Jr. v. Darrel AdamsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Joseph Wood, III v. Charles RyanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
90 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.