Legal Opinion

Mallott v. City of Brownsville

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided December 7, 1927No. Motion No. 7793; No. 818—4853PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpeer, J.

Upon the original hearing (298 S. W. 540), we reported this case for affirmance of the judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals (292 S. W. 606). The suit was one for injunction by plaintiff in error, involving the validity of an ordinance of the defendant in error, city of Brownsville. The trial court and the Court of Civil Appeals both held the ordinance to be valid, and the Court of Civil Appeals further denied the injunction for the want of threatened injury to plaintiff in error. We affirmed the judgment, but expressly declined to put the affirmance upon the ground of- the validity of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Malott v. City of BrownsvilleTexas Commission of Appeals · 1927
  2. Malott v. City of BrownsvilleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Gambrell v. Chalk Hill Theatre Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1947
  2. Jacobs v. City of DenisonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1952
  3. Brownsville & Matamoros Municipal Bridge Co. v. Gateway Bridge Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1928
  4. Brownsville Matamors Mun. v. Gateway B.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1928
  5. Malott v. City of BrownsvilleTexas Commission of Appeals · 1928

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API