Legal Opinion

Hansen v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided April 21, 1997No. 94CA1891, 95CA0042PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge ROY.

In this consolidated appeal, defendant, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (State Farm), appeals a judgment entered on a jury verdict in favor of plaintiff, Linda Hansen, on her claims for unpaid PIP benefits, bad faith breach of an insurance contract, and attorney fees and interest. We reverse and remand for a new trial.

Plaintiff’s claims arose from State Farm’s alleged failure to investigate adequately and pay PIP benefits for injuries she suffered in two automobile accidents, one in August 1991 in which she apparently sustained a brain injury, and the other…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Hock v. New York Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1994
  2. Jordan v. BognerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
  3. Davis v. ClineSupreme Court of Colorado · 1972
  4. Dominion Insurance Company Limited v. HartSupreme Court of Colorado · 1972
  5. Lee v. Great Empire Broadcasting, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1989

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hansen v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1998
  2. Ahmadi v. Allstate Insurance Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2001
  3. Howard T. Mowers v. The Paul Revere Life Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
  4. Mowers v. Paul Revere Life InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1998
  5. Mowers v. Paul Revere Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API