Legal Opinion
Ripley v. Commissioner of Social Security
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided December 4, 2019No. 3:18-cv-02976Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRCT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION TIMOTHY LEE RIPLEY, ) ) CASE NO. 3:18-CV-02976-JDG Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) MAGISTRATE JUDGE ) JONATHAN D. GREENBERG COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL ) SECURITY, ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION & Defendant. ) ORDER Plaintiff, Timothy Ripley (“Plaintiff” or “Ripley”), challenges the final decision of Defendant, Andrew Saul,1 Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”), denying his application for a Period of Disability (“POD”) and Disability Insurance Benefits (“DIB”) under Title II of the Social Security Act,
42 U.S.C. §§ 416(i), 423,…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Debra Rogers v. Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- Charlene M. CUTLIP, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
- David Bowen v. Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.