Legal Opinion
Dooley v. Commonwealth
Supreme Court of Virginia
Decided April 23, 1956No. Record 4520PublishedCited by 25 opinions
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the CourtWhittle, J.
Dooley was convicted of operating a motor vehicle at a speed of 62 miles per hour in a 5 5-mile zone. Radar equipment was employed in determining the speed of the car.
Defendant’s assignments of error are: (1) That the trial court erred in holding that radar warning signs had been posted in accordance with subsection (c) of §46-215.2 of the Code (1954 Cum. Supp., pp. 83, 84); and (2) That the court erred in holding that § 46-215.2 did not violate the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States.
The facts as stipulated in the trial court are contained in the record before us…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Tot v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Yee Hem v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- People v. . CannonNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
- State v. DantonioSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1955
- Burnette v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1953
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Satcher v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1992
- Andy Chavez v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2018
- State v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
- McLaughlin v. GholsonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1970
- Crenshaw v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1978
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.