Legal Opinion

Auernheimer v. Metzen

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 13, 1989No. 87-CV-0188-JC; CA A49419PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*644RIGGS, J.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment denying him strict foreclosure of a land sale contract. The trial court held that plaintiff had waived his right to foreclose by accepting installment payments after he knew that defendants were delinquent in their obligation to pay property taxes. On de novo review, we affirm.

In April, 1985, plaintiff sold a parcel of real property to defendants by a land sale contract. The contract included a “time of the essence” clause and provided that defendants would pay “all taxes * * * promptly before the same or any part thereof became past due * * *.” In…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Staats v. PraegitzerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Alderman v. DavidsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  2. Shirley v. TolbertCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  3. Auernheimer v. MetzenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API