Legal Opinion

Dowd v. Town of Dedham

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided September 17, 2003PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The petitioner, Thomas F. Dowd, filed a document entitled “Pro Se Appellant’s Verified Emergency Appeal," which a single justice of this court treated as a G. L. c. 211, § 3, petition and denied without a hearing. On appeal, the *1008petitioner asks tins court to determine that a town official violated G. L. c. 56, § 12, and to order the Attorney General to “convene” a grand jury to seek an indictment against the official for violation of that statute. Not only was this relief not requested in the petition filed with the single justice, see Bloise v. Bloise, 437 Mass. 1010, 1010 (2002), but the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bloise v. BloiseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
  2. Moore v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Marides v. RossiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2006
  2. Chawla v. Appeals CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2019
  3. Watson v. WalkerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2006
  4. Burnham v. Commonwealth (No. 1)Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2020
  5. Chawla v. Appeals CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2019

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API