Legal Opinion · Concurrence

United States Smelting, Refining & Mining Co. v. Nielsen

Utah Supreme Court

Decided January 23, 1968No. 10703Published

1ConcurrenceCrockett, Chief Justice

(concurring) :

A rehearing was granted to re-examine the contention that the decision previously made1 would have far-reaching effects in workmen’s compensation cases. I adhere to the decision denying the award, but at the risk of being somewhat repetitious of ideas expressed in the original opinion, I desire to state my reasons for doing so. Before directing attention to them, I digress to state that I do not believe that that decision, the effect of which is confined to its own facts anyway, would have any such dire consequences as is urged by counsel amicus curiae. Actually there is a very…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Pacific Intermountain Express Co. v. State Tax CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Nelden v. ClarkUtah Supreme Court · 1899
  3. United States Smelting, Refining & Mining Co. v. NielsenUtah Supreme Court · 1967
  4. State Ex Rel. Public Service Commission v. Southern Pac. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Utah Apex Mining Co. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1949

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API