Legal Opinion
Crawford v. Artuz
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 11, 2001No. 98 Civ. 7938PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
MARRERO, District Judge.
Thomas L. Crawford (“Crawford”), pro se and incarcerated, petitions for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Crawford attacks his 1992 New York State murder conviction on the grounds that: (1) incriminating statements he made that were admitted in evidence were obtained in violation of his Miranda rights, (2) his confession was involuntary; (3) evidence presented at trial was tampered with, not properly authenticated and violated his right against unlawful search and seizure; and (4) he received ineffective assistance of counsel. For the…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Coppedge v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Estelle v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Duren v. LaMannaDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2020
- Gracesqui v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2019