Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re Carrow

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 25, 1974No. Crim. 11813PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

DEVINE, J. *

Robert D. Carrow, lawyer, was found guilty of contempt of court committed during the trial in which he represented Ruchel Magee. Two incidents of contempt were charged. On each petitioner was fined $500 and sentenced to five days in the county jail, the sentences to run consecutively. He seeks annulment by petition for habeas corpus. The Supreme Court has issued an order to show cause why the writ should not be granted, and has directed us to consider the matter in the light of In re Buckley, 10 Cal.3d 237 [110 Cal.Rptr. 121, 514 P.2d 1201].

A just disposition cannot be made…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Mayberry v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. People v. IbarraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  3. In Re LittleSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. In Re BuckleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Lyons v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. GarrisonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. People v. MartinezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  3. State v. BoydWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1981
  4. McCann v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
  5. In Re SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API