Legal Opinion · Dissent

Victor Villanueva v. State of Florida

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided July 7, 2016No. SC13-1828Published

1DissentCanady, J.

Because I conclude that the trial court acted within the broad discretion provided by section 948.03, Florida Statutes (2011), for trial courts ,to impose conditions of probation, I would approve the decision of the Third District on review. I therefore dissent.

The majority’s decision is based on a misreading of Biller v. State, 618 So.2d 734 (Fla.1993)—a misreading that unduly limits the discretion afforded to trial judges by section 948.03 to impose special conditions of probation. The statute provides that “[t]he court shall determine the terms and conditions of probation.” § 948.03(1),…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. LentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  2. People v. DominguezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  3. Biller v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
  4. Rodriguez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
  5. Hines v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1978

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API