Legal Opinion

Schroeder Bros. v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided November 19, 1926No. 2752PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBaRber, Judge

The merchandise in this case is manufactured from tomatoes and is imported in hermetically sealed tins. It was classified and assessed by the collector as tomato paste under the second provision of paragraph 770 of the Tariff Act of 1922. The paragraph reads as follows:

Tomatoes in their natural state, one-half of 1 cent per pound; tomato paste, 40 per centum ad valorem; all other, prepared or preserved in any manner, 15 per centum ad valorem.

In their protest importers claimed classification under the last provision of the paragraph or, in the alternative, as a sauce under paragraph 773 of the…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Giavi v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931
  2. Protests 713642-G of Turin Grotto RestaurantUnited States Customs Court · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API