Legal Opinion

La Sance v. Casey

California Supreme Court

Decided January 26, 1931No. Docket No. S.F. 13411PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWaste, C. J.

This action, instituted by plaintiff’s testate, Christopher J. La Sanee [hereinafter referred to as the plaintiff or respondent], for damages for personal injuries received by him when struck by defendant’s automobile, resulted in a verdict and judgment for $9,000 in favor of plaintiff. Defendant appeals.

An extended statement of the facts of the Case is unnecessary. It is sufficient to say that plaintiff and his wife had alighted from a street-car at a transfer point, and were standing on a “safety station” awaiting the arrival of the ear to which they intended to transfer; and that…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. FowlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Derricotte v. UlitskySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  2. Weissman v. HokampCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API