Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Carson v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided February 16, 1972No. A-17085Published

1ConcurrenceSimms, Judge

(specially concurring):

Justice Bussey is eminently correct in his conclusion of affirmance of the trial court. Use of the language in his opinion “All *1399cases to the contrary are expressly overruled” obviously relates to dicta in Lee v. Collins, Judge, Vol. 41 O.B.J. 2768, which dicta lead to much confusion at the trial level when the same fact situation led to both the filing of an application to revoke a suspended sentence and an Information or complaint.

A reading of Lee v. Collins, supra, leads one to conclude that a formal adjudication of the criminal offense must occur before a hearing can…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re Habeas Corpus of CollyarCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1970
  2. State v. EdelbluteIdaho Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Phillips v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API