Legal Opinion

Viner & Miller, Inc. v. Phillips, Canby & Fuller, Inc.

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided March 7, 1949No. Civ. No. 3842-48Published

1Opinion of the Court

PINE, District Judge.

This is a motion for summary judgment. It is made by one of three defendants, namely Connecticut General Life Insurance Company, hereinafter referred to as Connecticut. The other .two defendants are Phillips, Canby & Fuller, Inc., and Ban-nockburn , Heights Improvement Company, referred to herein as Phillips and Bannock-burn, respectively.

Plaintiffs are engaged in the contracting and building business. Phillips is engaged in the real estate business. Bannock-burn owned certain land in Maryland. Connecticut, among other things, is engaged in lending money. The complaint…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bowen v. Mount Vernon Sav. BankCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939
  2. Crook v. International Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1909
  3. Peyser v. VolskCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API