Legal Opinion

Mullen v. Dayringer

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 24, 1985No. WD 36375PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TURNAGE, Presiding Judge.

Richard Dayringer filed suit against Leo Mullen and his wife, Dolores, for damages arising from the malicious prosecution of a civil suit. The jury returned a verdict in favor of Dayringer against both Mullens for $35,960 actual damages and $100,000 punitive damages against Leo and $25,000 in punitive damages against Dolores. The court struck the $25,000 in punitive damages against Dolores and entered judgment on the remainder of the verdict.

On this appeal Leo and Dolores raise a number of points including the submissibility of the case, error in instructions, error…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Sanders v. Daniel International Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1984
  2. Labrier v. Anheuser Ford, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1981
  3. Haswell v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1977
  4. Grimm v. GargisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1957
  5. Koehler v. Burlington Northern, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1978

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Larabee v. WashingtonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. Moore v. Missouri-Nebraska Express, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. Grabinski v. Blue Springs Ford Sales, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
  4. Collins v. HertensteinMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
  5. DeLong v. Hilltop Lincoln-Mercury, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1991

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API