Legal Opinion

Bolden v. Nautilus Insurance Company

District Court, M.D. Alabama

Decided August 1, 2022No. 3:20-cv-00390Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA EASTERN DIVISION LATISHA BOLDEN, as mother ) and next friend of T.B., a minor, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) CIVIL ACT. NO. 3:20-cv-390-ECM ) [WO] NAUTILUS INSURANCE COMPANY, ) ) Defendant. ) ORDER AND FINAL JUDGMENT On July 11, 2022, the Court entered a Memorandum Opinion and Order granting Defendant Nautilus Insurance Company’s (“Nautilus”) motion for summary judgment and granting Nautilus’ motion for default judgment against Plaintiff Arnetta Moore on Nautilus’ counterclaim for declaratory judgment. (Doc. 48).…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. v. NowlinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  2. Admiral Insurance Co. v. Price-WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API