Legal Opinion

People v. Kraemer

New York County Courts

Decided July 8, 1958PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFred Munder, J.

The respondents’ motion for a corrected return is granted and the return will be deemed corrected by the addition of the photo static copies of the original docket entries io the earlier returns filed herein.

On the present record the respondents renew their motion to dismiss the appeal by the People, contending that the lower court decided issues of fact as well as questions of law. I agree, however, with the learned Police Justice that his decision was one on law alone.

The ordinance alleged to have been violated reads: ‘ ‘ Section 1. No person shall intrude upon any lot or piece of land…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. People v. ProsserNew York Court of Appeals · 1955
  2. People v. . FabianNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
  3. People v. KraemerLloyd Harbor Village Police Court · 1957
  4. People v. LevensteinNew York Court of Appeals · 1956
  5. People v. De Luigi, New York County Courts1955

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kraemer v. County CourtNew York Court of Appeals · 1959
  2. People v. AshermanNew York County Court, Westchester County · 1961
  3. People v. SouthNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  4. People v. South, New York County Courts1975
  5. People v. ScudderNew York Justice Court · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API