State v. Burgess
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
KHOUZAM, Judge.
The State of Florida appeals, and Tomas Burgess cross-appeals, an order granting in part and denying in part Burgess’s motion for discharge. The order dismissed three of six pending charges based on the trial court’s conclusion that Burgess had not waived his right to a speedy trial by the time the State filed a superseding information. But because the record reflects that Burgess did waive his right to a speedy trial before the superseding information was filed, we reverse the portion of the order dismissing the pending charges. We find no merit in Burgess’s cross-appeal and…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Nelson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973
- State v. NelsonSupreme Court of Florida · 2010
- State v. NaveiraSupreme Court of Florida · 2004
- State v. CliftonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Martha Miles v. City of Edgewater Police DepartmentDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
- State v. Templar-O'BrienDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
- Lozano v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
- BELAFONTE LOPEZ ROSIER v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
- Jackson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.