Legal Opinion

Rosenthal v. Agate

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 16, 2006Published

1Opinion of the Court

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of mandamus, inter alia, to compel the respondent, Augustus Agate, a Justice of the Supreme Court, Queens County, among other things, to sign an order to show cause to hold the nonparty respondents in contempt of court for failure to comply with a subpoena directing them to appear for postjudgment depositions in an action entitled Rosenthal v Orlando, pending in the Supreme Court, Queens County, under index No. 15126/96.

Adjudged that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

Mandamus does not lie…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Greenhaus v. MilanoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API