Legal Opinion

Howard Bauder Kahmann, Jr. v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)

Decided April 6, 1994No. 03-92-00406-CRPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ONION, Justice (Retired).

This appeal arises out of a conviction for engaging in organized criminal activity. After the jury found appellant guilty, it assessed his punishment at twenty-five years’ imprisonment and a fine of $10,000.

A sole point of error is advanced. Appellant contends that the “trial court’s findings that a material change of circumstances has occurred since appellant’s determination of indigency and that appellant is no longer indigent are not supported by the record.” The thrust of appellant’s contention is that the trial court found that he was not indigent at the time of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Griffin v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  2. Galitz v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
  3. Abdnor v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
  4. Snoke v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
  5. Barber v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1976

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Shumake, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1997
  2. Curlin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1994
  3. Broderick Robinson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2005
  4. Broderick Robinson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2005
  5. Ex Parte Rueben Shumake, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1997

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API