Legal Opinion

Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp. v. James

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided August 26, 1994No. 1930670 to 1930672PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The defendant, Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corporation ("Owens-Corning"), appeals from separate judgments entered on jury verdicts in favor of the plaintiffs, Harold C. Green, Sr., James B. Henson, and Willie J. James, in their actions seeking damages for exposure to asbestos. We affirm.

The plaintiffs, retired steelworkers, sued Owens-Corning under various legal theories, seeking damages based on allegations that they had contracted asbestosis, a progressive and incurable lung disease, because of prolonged on-the-job exposure to asbestos products that had been manufactured by Owens-Corning. A…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Aubrey Hendrix v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
  2. Spradlin v. SpradlinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  3. Purvis v. PPG Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  4. Liberty Nat. Life Ins. Co. v. BeasleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  5. Nash v. CosbySupreme Court of Alabama · 1991

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Flexible Products Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2005
  2. Ex Parte JacksonSupreme Court of Alabama · 2009
  3. Qore, Inc. v. Bradford Bldg. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2009
  4. Baldwin County Elec. Membership Corp. v. City of FairhopeSupreme Court of Alabama · 2008
  5. Ex Parte Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2008

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API