Legal Opinion

Bolin v. T & T MINING

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided August 23, 2007No. 2006-SC-000787-WCPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

KRS 342.125(5)(a) requires a worker seeking to reopen an award rendered under KRS 342.732 to make a preliminary showing that includes a progression of pneumoconiosis, the development of respiratory impairment due the disease, and two additional years of continuous exposure to the hazards of the disease in Kentucky.

Daniel Bolin supported his motion to reopen with evidence of a progression of pneumoconiosis and a greater respiratory impairment but had received no additional exposure to coal dust. Thus, an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) dismissed his motion, and the Workers’…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Gateway Construction Company v. WallbaumCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1962
  2. Messer v. DreesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1964
  3. Johnson v. Gans Furniture Industries, Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Shamrock Coal Co., Inc. v. MaricleKentucky Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Slone v. R & S MINING, INC.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2002

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Buster v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2012
  2. O'Reilly Automotive Stores, Inc. v. Tony ErnspikerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2021
  3. Randy Deal v. Gunther Nash Mining Construction CompanyKentucky Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Randy Deal v. Gunther Nash Mining Construction CompanyKentucky Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Toyota Motor Manufacturing, Kentucky, Inc. v. JohnsonKentucky Supreme Court · 2010

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API