Legal Opinion

Eyler v. Adolph Beauty System, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 1, 1965No. [No. 234, September Term, 1964.]PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHammond, J.

“A party cannot walk upon an obstruction which has been made by the fault of another and avail himself of it, if he did not himself use common and ordinary caution.” Sugar v. Traub, 233 Md. 320, 323, quoting Sutton v. Baltimore, 214 Md. 581, 584.

Judge Menchine felt the appellant to be in the position of the party in the quotation and made him understandably unhappy by taking from him the fruits of a jury’s verdict in his favor, by the granting of a judgment n.o.v. We think he was right in so doing.

Appellant went out on a very cold February evening to replenish the family larder at a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. McManamon v. High's Dairy Products Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1963
  2. Sutton v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1957
  3. Sugar v. TraubCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
  4. Burns v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1921
  5. Tyler v. Martin's Dairy, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1961

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Menish v. Polinger CompanyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
  2. Mattos, Inc. v. HashCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
  3. Craig v. Greenbelt Consumer Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
  4. Rooney v. Statewide Plumbing & Heating—General Contractors, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1972
  5. Ensor v. OrtmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API