Johnson v. Goord

—Determination unanimously confirmed without costs and petition dismissed. Memorandum: Petitioner contends that the determination is arbitrary and capricious because the Hearing Officer failed to set forth the evidence upon which he relied. We disagree, and conclude that the Hearing Officer’s decision complied with the requirements of 7 NYCRR 254.7 (a) (5). We reject petitioner’s further contention that the determination is not supported by substantial evidence (see, Matter of Bryant v Coughlin, 77 NY2d 642, 647; Matter of Anderson v Goord, 270 AD2d 836). Finally, petitioner failed to exhaust…