North Chestnut Hill Neighbors v. Zoning Board of Adjustment
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Dissent
DISSENTING OPINION BY
Judge PELLEGRINI.
Because a grant of a use variance for a use already in existence is an unknown and unauthorized zoning remedy, I respectfully dissent.
Woodmere Art Museum (Museum) is an art museum in a five-story Victorian mansion on five-and-one-half acres in the Chestnut Hill area of Philadelphia. The area is zoned R-l Residential under the Philadelphia Zoning Code (Zoning Code) in which institutional uses are not allowed. However, because the Museum existed before the Zoning Code’s enactment and opened to the public in 1940, normally, it would be considered as a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Peirce AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
- MacK Zoning AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
- Arter v. Philadelphia Zoning Board of AdjustmentCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Spc Co. v. Zoning Bd. of PhiladelphiaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Laurento v. Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.