State Ex Rel. Wash. Univ. v. Publ. Serv. Comm.
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Dissent
Differing, as I do, from the reasoning and conclusions of the majority opinion I feel constrained, in view of the importance of the legal questions involved, to express, at some length, the grounds of my dissent from the majority opinion. In so doing I have followed, in the main, the reasoning and at times the verbiage of the original opinion filed in this case by our learned Commissioner, HIGBEE, then one of the judges of this court, in which the judgment of the circuit court was affirmed, but which opinion was not adopted, and the case was thereupon reassigned. I concurred in that…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Terminal Taxicab Co. v. KutzSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- New Orleans v. New Orleans Water Works Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
- City of Pawhuska v. Pawhuska Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Steele v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1915
- Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co. v. ManningSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.